In class Thursday we embarked on a very heated discussion about what
would be the conditions that would support or undermine morality. As the
conversation progressed, many opinions and views were thrown around in
regards to individual moral actions and collective moral actions. Now I
have pondered the different components of this discussion since then and
have come to the conclusion that an action can be deemed moral or
immoral depending upon whether or not an individual's life can be
positively promoted in any aspect. For example, why would lying be
amoral? In regards to the context I just specified, it would be amoral
because the individual who is being lied to has been "compromised." At
some point when the truth is revealed, the individual that was lied to
will be forced to think about that situation and ponder the effects that
the lie caused. Now some people may believe that lying may promote
positive results by either protecting the person from the truth or
keeping them from some form of harm, i.e. psychological or emotional.
However, we can all admit that whenever we finally encounter the truth
about a situation, we immediately wonder "what if." This "what if" that
we begin to contemplate only hurts us because it distracts us from
focusing on the present and future. The past is the past, and what
happened during it cannot be changed. But when people reflect on the
past, we must all admit that it hinders our future. Therefore, lying
should be deemed as immoral.
In regards to the "trolling" example that was discussed, I firmly
believe that trolling is immoral because it does not positively promote
someone's life. Choosing to partake in actions that promote anger or
frustration from an individual is wrong. Why should someone feel as
though it is acceptable to control the emotions of another simply
because "they wanted to?" Being angry has never made the angry
individual happy. Harboring anger for an extended amount of time, or for
even a few minutes diminishes a person's morality and mental psyche
because a person's rationale is always compromised when emotions become
involved. For those people who think that trolling is simply a harmless
action, I'm sure I'll meet opposition, and I'm sure that I will become a
victim of trolling. But for those against trolling I hope that my
position on morality is plausible.
Awake to the World: A Blog for Mercer Philosophers
Tuesday, February 19, 2013
How Do We Make Our Own Meaning?
In class today, well yesterday, Dr. Thomas posed the question: "What conditions are necessary to make a meaningful life?" And I've come to the conclusion that there are at least two conditions that are necessary: First, we as individuals, must be rational or clear-thinking individuals and second, we must not only possess knowledge about ourselves, but nature and the external world itself. So, the ability to think and the ability to have understanding are necessary to make our own meaning of life.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)